In Litigation Review, Are You Obliged to Read Every Document? A View From the E-Disclosure Information Project

Contact: Warwick Sharp, Vice President, Marketing and Business Development, Equivio Inc.
(800) 851-1965 | info@equivio.com | www.equivio.com

Many lawyers are reluctant to rely on technology to cull and filter document collections. They fear that delegating tasks to a machine and not reading every document themselves — once considered the "gold standard" — somehow equates to falling short of their duties to the court and clients. At the same time, the sheer volume of electronic documents today renders human review impractical, expensive and prone to error. Given the advancement of technological e-Disclosure solutions, it is time that lawyers "let go."

Cost-conscious clients will only litigate if they can get an early idea of both likely outcome and projected costs. To this end, lawyers need early case assessment capabilities that allow them to make timely decisions as to case strategy and resources needed for subsequent stages.

A new white paper by Chris Dale of the UK-based e-Disclosure Information Project describes the legal issues around emerging new review strategies, showing how new technology from Equivio helps lawyers address the exploding cost challenges of e-disclosure in a defensible manner.

Download this white paper, which is published here for the first time.

Sincerely,

Warwick Sharp
Vice President, Marketing and Business Development
Equivio Inc.
5260-G Nicholson Lane
Suite 150
Kensington, MD 20895
(800) 851-1965
info@equivio.com
www.equivio.com

Back to Top